Weeds - new publication will help us identify and regulate them
Blog Post | Christine Milne
Friday 29th August 2008, 1:50pm
by ChristineMilne in
I was very pleased today to launch an excellent new publication by Rod Randall, from the Weeds CRC, which will be an invaluable tool in the fight against weeds in Australia. It's a book, but it's also free to download online!
Everyone knows that weeds and feral animals - alien invasive species - stand beside habitat destruction and climate change as the main drivers of biodiversity loss worldwide. But many people don't realise how widespread invasive species are in Australia.
We have introduced 28,000 plants in 200 years, and many of them have become weeds which have overwhelmed ecosystems that do not have the capacity to adapt.
In Uluru, for example, 900ha of the park has been invaded by buffel grass, which is leading to the loss of native birds and reptiles as well as a changed fire regime, threatening native plants.
Scientists estimate that the pre-European rate of plant introductions was as little as one to five per century. Is it any wonder that our ecosystems can't cope with the current onslaught.
The good news is that Rod Randall has just listed all the introduced plant species found in Australia now, as well as their weed status. This is a major contribution to the national interest, especially in the light of the fact that recently Bunnings released for distribution around the country a shocking invasive weed, Mexican feathergrass, because it was wrongly labelled.
With Rod's publication, Introduced Flora of Australia and Its Weed Status, there is absolutely no excuse for any retailer to be selling weeds to the public. More importantly, governments, state and federal, need to agree to a mandatory labelling system for all plants sold and also use the new national weeds research centre to develop national regulations so that we don't have the NT Government encouraging the planting of certain grasses while natural resource managers pay people to take them out in other states!
This excellent resource is free and available on the web, and already 230,000 people have visited the site, before it was even officially launched today!
Launching the publication today, it became clear that what we have to do in Australia is prioritise natural resource management as a clear component of mitigation and adaptation in relation to climate change. We have to build resilience in ecosystems so that they can best adapt and best store as much carbon as possible.
The best way of giving all our plants and animals their best chance of survival.
There is potentially a rich source of new jobs here, especially for indigenous Australians in northern Australia, in maintaining ecosystems free of weeds and stopping further incursions. Priorities for governments need to be mandatory labelling and uniform laws across the states and territories, and it is essential that the new national weeds research centre is not only high profile, but an independent centre which links all of the work being done through the CSIRO, Bureau of Rural Science, state departments, universities, research and development corporations and the federal departments. The PM is on notice that this national weeds research centre must not be just part of the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, and subsumed in the bureaucracy.
Having been the poor relation for years, protection of biodiversity is rushing on to the global agenda, in the lead up to the UN year of Biodiversity in 2010 and Australia can make a big contribution by promoting the links between all of the key UN conventions - Biodiversity, Desertification, Ramsar, and UNFCCC - through an increased focus on invasive species.


Weeds
Great stuff Rod Randall! Well done.
Weeds
There is a new and virulent species of weed found in Tasmania, usually around Hobart, but only this week an outbreak was spotted in Launceston. It is a completely noxious and obnoxious plant and is usually coloured black, synonymous with that other use of the word weed. If seen it should be treated with copious amounts of Atrazine or burnt as it has a similar affect on native forests, when allowed to mix with other plants from the same genus. Its name: Davidious Bartlettsis or Catalytic Forest mould , so named because it eats away at native forests species by enlisting the help of other species . Avoid contact with this weed at all times.
Sorry, I could not resist that.
Could someone please check
Could someone please check the link to the online weeds book as it is not working, thank you
Hmmmm
Thanks for drawing that to our attention, Rob. Unfortunately, I've just checked, and the link is correct. It seems that UQ are having server problems...
Hopefully it'll be sorted out soon.
link to book
Hi Rob,
The link to the pdf of the book is available here on the Weeds CRC's website: http://www.weedscrc.org.au/documents/intro_flora_australia.pdf
The link to the searchable database is at UQ and it is:
http://weeds.cbit.uq.edu.au/
for your future reference, because I can see that the UQ link is still not working.
cheers
Rita
Weeds CRC
Website back up
The problem has been fixed. They are grateful to us for identifying the problem. Thanks, Rob!
Preferences
I do not agree with our preferencial voting system and would like my vote to stop with my initial choice. Do all candidates and parties have to pass their votes on and is there a way around it?
Please see this other post...
Hi Rhonda,
Please have a look at this post here for info on this issue.
In future, I'd be grateful if you could attempt to find a relevant post to make a comment on, as we like to keep comments on topic. You can find a list of all categories that we have posts on in the right hand column, amongst whichyou will find the word "preferences". Click there for 4 posts on the issue.
Many thanks.
Weeds
THe author is to be congratulated on this work. It should form the basis for those trying to work in cooperation with regional NRM Boards. I could not down load it either - but I will keep trying. Such a book should have a section on the method(s) for eradication that are acceptable within eah state authority so that those who want to take action have an introduction as to what to do. John Hunwick
Why is it that we see all
Why is it that we see all other modes of of seed/plant transfer as "natural," but if humans do it, it is unnatural? Are humans unnatural somehow? If a bird brought the same species over and introduced it, what would be the difference?
What's the difference?
Scale, P Monroe, scale. And speed.
Humanity, through our sheer numbers and power, can make a massive difference to an ecosystem very fast. Birds can't.
P. Monroe, Good question.
P. Monroe, Good question. Not an expert but I think the answer lies in what a weed is. It's a plant that is out of place - Australian plants can become weeds just as easily as exotic ones if they are taken out of the area where they evolved.
The real problem with weeds is they kill bio-diversity. They move into a spot which is almost certainly already occupied by a species that has been there a long while. The resident species has the disadvantage in that other species have evolved along with it, so it has it's own pests which are dependent on it which keep it in balance with the rest of the environment. It also has it's own pollinators dependent on it and plays host to species which may be neutral to it, or of some benefit to it. Other plants have evolved to be able to compete with it for resources - it's a even playing field out there in evolutionary terms.
The weed on the other hand can be a Godzilla plant with nothing to keep it in check. Often they have left their pests and diseases behind. Some are not huge spreaders, but others like lantana can swamp whole areas. Not only the plants in those areas are swamped by the weed, but all the other creatures that depended on them are put out of action too.
If we got off the planet and left it alone for tens of thousands of years, then things would evolve along with the weeds. That's not going to happen, and in the meantime, we risk losing thousands of species to them and ending up with impoverished eco-systems.
Sorry whoops, I got all
Sorry whoops, I got all excited about evolution and didn't address the real question, re: Birds - the difference there is the number of weed species that humans have introduced compared to birds.
I'm sure bird introduced weed species can become a problem. But while they introduce some, and many bird introduced species have been here a while which is why you can get similar species say in wetlands to other country's I believe, we have introduced 10,000's of species and not by accident. Nothing natural about that, we are getting swamped.
Post new comment