Questions On Notice

Questions on Notice
Senators may, at any time, address written questions on notice to ministers and other senators. As soon as practicable, questions are forwarded to the appropriate ministers’ offices and to the relevant departments where replies are drafted for consideration by the minister. When a reply is approved by the minister it is delivered to the senator who asked the question and both question and reply are printed in Hansard.

Questions without Notice
Question time in the Senate is scheduled to begin at 2.00 p.m. on each sitting day and usually continues for an hour. The President asks if there are any questions without notice and senators wishing to ask questions rise in their places. After the question has been asked the President calls on the appropriate minister to answer.

Green Loans Scheme debacle - Question Time

Question | Spokesperson Christine Milne
Wednesday 3rd February 2010, 9:04pm

Senator MILNE (2.23 pm)-My question is to the minister representing the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts, Senator Wong. Can the minister confirm that the government promised to limit the number of home sustainability assessors accredited to conduct its Green Loans Program to between 1,000 and 2,000 to ensure sustainable work would be available to each of them? Given that so many people invested thousands of dollars in undertaking training and establishing small businesses on the basis of that promise, can the minister now explain why the government has allowed 5,000 assessors to be trained and accredited with a further 5,000 trained and awaiting accreditation, destroying job security and undermining the viability of many businesses?

Why won't the Govt fix the renewable energy target?

Question | Spokesperson Christine Milne
Wednesday 28th October 2009, 12:00am

Senator MILNE (2.28 pm)-My question is to the Minister for Climate Change and Water, Senator Wong. Minister, do you stand by your assurances to the Senate earlier this year that solar hot water and heat pumps would only account for five per cent of the renewable energy target and their inclusion posed no risk to the integrity of the scheme?

Green Loans Program

Question | Spokesperson Christine Milne
Wednesday 16th September 2009, 2:00pm

Senator MILNE (2.30 pm)-My question is to the Minister representing the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts, Senator Wong. It refers to the Green Loans Program, which was supposed to begin in January and eventually commenced in July. Can the minister confirm to the Senate that, in spite of 25,000 home sustainability assessments having been completed, three months into the program not one report necessary to secure a green loan from a lending institution has been approved by DEWHA? When can any of the 25,000 Australians waiting for a green loan expect to see the report that will facilitate the money?

Green loans debacle

Question | Spokesperson Christine Milne
Tuesday 15th September 2009, 12:00am

Senator MILNE (Tasmania) (2:30 PM) -My question is to the Minister representing the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts, Senator Wong. It refers to the Green Loans Program, which was supposed to begin in January and eventually commenced in July. Can the minister confirm to the Senate that, in spite of 25,000 home sustainability assessments having been completed, three months into the program not one report necessary to secure a green loan from a lending institution has been approved by DEWHA? When can any of the 25,000 Australians waiting for a green loan expect to see the report that will facilitate the money?

Did Rudd Govt censor Pacific Nations?

Question | Spokesperson Christine Milne
Tuesday 11th August 2009, 12:00am

Senator MILNE (Tasmania) (2:31 PM) -My question is to the Minister for Climate Change and Water, Minister Wong, and refers to the recent Pacific Islands Forum and the Smaller Island States Group meeting which Australia hosted and for which Australia provided secretariat support. Given the consistent and outspoken calls from Pacific Island nations for a 45 per cent below 1990 level reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from developed countries by 2020, why was that not reflected in the outputs from either of these meetings held in Australia? Did you as the minister, the Prime Minister or any Australian official block the inclusion of such strong targets or any reference to a 2020 target in the Pacific Islands Forum communique or did you or any other Australian official block the release of a communique at all from the Smaller Island States Group meeting?

Question on National Academy of Music 2

Question | Spokesperson Christine Milne
Tuesday 2nd December 2008, 12:00am

QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Australian National Academy of Music
Question
Senator MILNE (2.34 p.m.)-My question is to the Minister representing the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts, Senator Wong. Given that the government has acknowledged that the artistic program of the Australian National Academy of Music is first class, by appropriating the name and reputation of the institution, why is the artistic leadership being handed over to a university appointed advisory board with not one practising musician of international standard on it, rather than leaving it with the current faculty and artistic director, who, by the way, has just won the Grawemeyer prize for composition, music's Nobel Prize?

Question on National Academy of Music

Question | Spokesperson Christine Milne
Monday 24th November 2008, 4:04pm

Senator MILNE (2.29 pm)-My question is to the Minister representing the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts, Senator Wong, and relates to the closure of the Australian National Academy of Music. Minister, can you explain why Minister Garrett has repeatedly raised the two independent reviews of the academy-the Mills review and the Grant review-as justifications for his decision to defund the academy, when both reviews clearly and explicitly called for increased funding for the academy to enable it to grow? Isn't Minister Garrett misleading the Australian community?

Tasmanian Devil facial tumour question

Question | Spokesperson Christine Milne
Monday 7th May 2007, 12:00am

QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tasmanian Devils
(Question No. 3188)
Senator Milne (Tasmania) asked the Minister representing the Minister for the Environment and Water Resources, upon notice, on 7 May 2007:
(1) Has the department received the Tasmanian Government's options proposal for the ongoing management of healthy Tasmanian devils in the wild, including plans to release them on Tasmanian offshore islands, particularly Maria Island.
(2) In light of concerns raised by community groups, will the department seek public comment on these proposals.
(3) Does the Government agree with proposals to release Tasmanian devils on various offshore islands.
(4) Does the Government consider the island release option an essential part of the long-term recovery plan for the Tasmanian devil in the wake of the transmissible facial tumour disease.
(5) What ongoing assistance is the Government offering to the research effort into devil facial tumour disease and for ongoing efforts to safeguard the species survival in the wild.
Senator Abetz (Tasmania-Minister for Fisheries, Forestry and Conservation)-The Minister for the Environment and Water Resources has provided the following answer to the honourable senator's question:
(1) No.
(2) If my Department receives a referral from the Tasmanian Government for the release of Tasmanian devils onto Maria Island, or any other offshore island, it will be made available for public comment on the Department's website for 10 business days, in accordance with the requirements of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act.
(3) The Government does not have a position on these proposals. If a specific proposal is referred to my Department, it will be assessed, and a decision will be made based on the relevant facts.
(4) As above.
(5) The Australian Government provided $2 million for the 2005/06 and 2006/07 financial years through the Tasmanian Regional Community Forest Agreement, to accelerate research into the Devil Facial Tumour Disease. In the 2007/08 financial year the Australian Government will provide a further $1 million to continue fieldwork that will help suppress the spread of the disease in the wild, monitor the spread of the disease, and continue to ensure that there are populations of Tasmanian devils established in captivity to enable their long-term survival in the wild.

Devil Facial Tumour Disease

Question | Spokesperson Christine Milne
Friday 4th August 2006, 12:00am

QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Devil Facial Tumour Disease
(Question No. 2300)
Senator Milne (Tasmania) asked the Minister for the Environment and Heritage, upon notice, on 4 August 2006:
(1) Is there a definitive pre-clinical test that can detect the presence of devil facial tumour disease (DFTD); if not, how can the Government be certain that the devils that have been exported will not develop DFTD at a later date.
(2) Given that Tasmania's Department of Primary Industries and Water (DPIW) state that the wildlife park that was to be used to source the devils for export was located in a region well away from where the disease has occurred: is the Government aware that DPIW maps in fact show that the areas surrounding the wildlife park in question have the highest transmission rates for DFTD.

Senator Ian Campbell (Western Australia-Minister for the Environment and Heritage)-The answer to the honourable senator's question is as follows:
(1) There are currently no definitive pre-clinical tests that can detect the presence of devil facial tumour disease (DFTD). Work on a pre-clinical test is being undertaken as a matter of priority as part of the joint Australian and Tasmanian Government's DFTD Programme.
The Tasmanian Devils that were exported were bred in captivity from a disease free managed population.
(2) The Tasmanian Chief Veterinary Officer determined that Tasmanian Devils can safely be moved between managed populations, subject to conditions attached to the export, such as ensuring that the managed population cannot come in contact with wild populations that may carry the disease.

Commonwealth funding to the Tasmanian forest industry under the RFA

Question | Spokesperson Christine Milne
Thursday 11th May 2006, 12:00am

QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Regional Forest Agreement
(Question No. 1786)
Senator Milne (Tasmania) asked the Minister for Fisheries, Forestry and Conservation, upon notice, on 11 May 2006:
With reference to Commonwealth funding to the Tasmanian forest industry as part of the 1997 Regional Forest Agreement (RFA):