Skip to Navigation
Skip to Content

Climate Change & the Zero Carbon World

Climate Change

Climate change has been a top priority for the Greens for many years and the party has a comprehensive policy platform that would see Australia take the only globally responsible course of action and start rebuilding our society and economy around the exciting vision of a zero emissions world.

While governments and industry are tinkering around the edges and talking about small, incremental action to reduce emissions, our climate is changing faster than most scientists had predicted and greenhouse emissions are increasing faster than the IPCC's worst scenarios. If the globe warms more than 2°C above pre-industrial levels the impacts will be too severe and the risks of runaway climate change too great. We only have a few years to turn around global emissions or 2°C warming will be locked in.

The Greens are the only political party in Australia to recognise that the time for incremental action is long past and we now need transformative policies to turn Australia from one of the world's worst polluters into a zero emissions economy of the future. Urgent action must start now. The Greens recognise that, if we get that action right, rolling out energy efficiency upgrades and switching to renewable energy, moving to fuel efficient and electric cars, with more car-pooling, redesigning our cities around mass transit hubs, cycleways and walking paths, and rethinking our agriculture and forestry, we can seize tremendous opportunities to make Australia a better, fairer, healthier and happier place to live.

Rudd Carbon Plan Unravelling: Urgent Review Needed

Media Release | Spokesperson Christine Milne
Saturday 20th December 2008, 1:17pm

The Australian Greens say the growing discontent over the Government's carbon trading scheme - including the Government's own advisor Professor Ross Garnaut - now means it's imperative that an immediate review be held of the scheme's targets and design.
Australian Greens Climate Spokesperson and Deputy Leader, Senator Christine Milne, said today's blunt assessment by Prof. Garnaut condemning compensation for big polluters as 'over the top', echoed other damning assessments from economists, scientists and environmentalists.

Climate politics vs climate action

Blog Post | Christine Milne
Friday 19th December 2008, 4:02pm

This was published today at ABC Unleashed

The release on Monday of the Rudd Government's climate change white paper is a clear demonstration that this Government is intent on playing politics with climate change without actually doing anything about it.

The useless emissions reduction target and self-defeating design of the scheme tells only half the story. The Government pre-empted the announcement by throwing half a billion dollars at expanding coal infrastructure in the Hunter Valley, and followed it up with a badly-designed incentive scheme for renewable energy that will ensure it does not grow beyond a marginal player to challenge the dominance of the coal sector.

Today's Age newspaper's editorial put it clearly:

Infrastructure list includes best and worst: Which will the Government pick?

Media Release | Spokesperson Christine Milne
Friday 19th December 2008, 3:31pm

Infrastructure Australia's short-list released today includes proposals which would help build a sustainable Australia and others which would lock the country into a high-polluting path for decades, the Australian Greens said today.

The proposals across transport, ports and energy are on balance positive, with more than half (based on indicative capital cost) likely to have a net positive environmental impact and less than half a questionable or net negative impact.

"Minister Albanese faces a clear choice as he considers these proposals - does he want to build a sustainable Australia or does he want to lock us into our high-polluting path," Australian Greens Deputy Leader and Climate Change Spokesperson, Senator Christine Milne, said.

NZ radio interview on White Paper

Greencast | Spokesperson Christine Milne
Thursday 18th December 2008, 10:13am

Christine talks to Paul Deady from NZ radio 95b

Get Flash to see this player.

Joyce, Milne lash out at emissions target

Newsflash | Spokesperson Christine Milne
Wednesday 17th December 2008, 9:55pm

Kicking the renewables sector while it's down: 20% undermined, no certainty for solar

Media Release | Spokesperson Christine Milne
Wednesday 17th December 2008, 12:56pm

Just two days after delivering its 'big polluters' bail-out package', the Rudd Government has announced a deeply flawed renewable energy target that breaches its election promise and will entrench sector's boom and bust cycles, the Australian Greens said today.

"After giving big polluters everything they asked for in Monday's white paper, today the Rudd Government is kicking the renewable energy sector while it's down," Australian Greens Deputy Leader and Climate Change Spokesperson, Senator Christine Milne, said.

5% emission target is not enough

Petition | Spokesperson Christine Milne
Wednesday 17th December 2008, 2:54am

On Monday, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd raised the white flag of surrender on climate change when he announced an emissions reduction target for Australia of just 5% below 2000 levels (4% below 1990 levels).
On Tuesday, Australians gathered in capital cities to begin the community campaign to tell Kevin Rudd: ‘No surrender on climate change'.

Some are more equal than others - what does the emissions target mean?

Blog Post | Christine Milne
Tuesday 16th December 2008, 8:00pm

This post was published originally this morning at ABC Online

One of the most important numbers in Australia's history was revealed yesterday - a number that carries with it the hopes and fears of millions of people and embodies our priorities as a nation, our balancing of the relative worth of human beings.

It has been argued that the 5 per cent 2020 emissions reduction target that Prime Minister Rudd announced is no more or less than a political balancing act - navigating a midway path between the competing demands of business and scientists, of the Coalition and the Greens. But that is an extremely superficial view, and one that fails to see just how all-encompassing climate change is. There are much deeper choices at the core of any decision on emissions targets.

Perhaps the most obvious of these choices is the question 'do we value our children as much as ourselves?'

Syndicate content